Wildcraft is 2.2× cheaper to get into — ₹45 L vs ₹1 Cr (about ₹55 lakh less). Puma runs the bigger network at 447 vs 132 outlets. Wildcraft takes less off the top (0% royalty vs 6%).
Numbers that separate them on a 5-year horizon — not the dealer-pitch summary.
Royalty structures diverge sharply: Wildcraft charges 0% while Puma takes 6% of revenue. On ₹50L annual turnover that's ₹300000 per year flowing out of your P&L, every year, for the lifetime of the agreement.
Puma has 3.4× more outlets than Wildcraft (447 vs 132) — more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also denser intra-brand competition in saturated markets.
Puma is expanding fastest here — 6 outlets per year since founding in 1948. High-velocity brands signal momentum but also mean new territory for individual franchisees gets handed out quickly; lock in your preferred area early.
Primary (flagship) format per brand. Smaller kiosk / express formats may have different economics.
Primary (flagship) franchise format per brand. Some brands also offer smaller kiosk / cloud-kitchen formats at lower capex — check the brand page for full format options.
Bigger networks mean more brand recognition and supplier scale; smaller ones mean less intra-brand competition in your territory.
Average outlets added per year since founding. High velocity = momentum + new territory assigned fast; low velocity = mature, saturated, or dormant.
Every verified data point. Green badge marks the more favourable value for a typical first-time operator.
| Metric | Puma | Wildcraft |
|---|---|---|
| Entry capex | ₹1 Cr | ₹45 L ↓ Lower |
| Royalty | 6% | 0% ↓ Lower |
| Min space (sqft) | 1500 | 800 ↓ Smaller |
| Total outlets | 447 ↑ Bigger | 132 |
| Franchise fee | ₹5 L | ₹4 L ↓ Lower |
| Working capital | ₹20 L | ₹12 L |
BrandFit asks 6 visual questions about your operator profile, capital, and location — then ranks all 240 brands by predicted success-fit for your situation. See where these brands really stand for someone like you.
Open this pair plus Reebok and Adidas (the next-largest Sports & Athleisure brands by network size) side-by-side in the full comparison tool. Add or swap brands to fit your decision.
Same data plus galleries, store-locator, margin economics, legal vault — free on every brand page.
Visitors researching this pair often look at these.
Wrapped in FAQPage JSON-LD for SERP rich-result eligibility.
Territorial exclusivity varies sharply across Sports & Athleisure operators and is rarely enforced uniformly. Most Indian franchise agreements carve out a "protected radius" (typically 500m–2km) rather than exclusive geographic zones. Always read the "Non-Competition" and "Protected Territory" clauses of the franchise agreement — and verify by asking existing franchisees if the brand has honoured them.
Beyond the advertised capex, factor in: refundable security deposit (₹1–5L), rent deposit (1–6 months of rent), working capital for inventory and salaries (typically ₹5–20L for first 3 months), signage and interior fit-out (often 25–40% of total setup), and ongoing royalty or supply-chain margins. FRANticc separates "at-risk capital" from "refundable capital" on every brand page so you see the real exposure.
Puma operates the largest network among these — 447 outlets. Large networks offer more brand recognition and supplier scale, but also mean denser intra-brand competition in already-saturated markets.
Among the 2 brands FRANticc compares, the top options by network size are Puma, Wildcraft (Puma: 447 stores, Wildcraft: 132 stores). The lowest investment entry is Wildcraft from ₹45 L. "Best" depends on your budget, location tier and involvement — this page gives you the data for all three dimensions.